Final MySQL sprint – comments
Section 1
Team 1 – 100
- near perfect peer rating – 33
- SCRUM/github – good use – almost all team members commit – 34
- structure of db/implementation of features: -33
Team 2 – 90
- peer rating – 29
- SCRUM/github – bcordova only one committing other than one instance of ‘unknown’. – 28
- structure of db/implementation of features – meets requirements -33
Team 3 – 92
- peer rating – 2nd best peer score – 31
- SCRUM/github – work doesn’t seem equally distributed. mmartin main contributor – 28
- structure of db/implementation of features – 33
Team 4 – 89
- peer rating – 29
- SCRUM/github – almost all commits by ‘unknown’ no comments for commit – 27
- structure of db/implementation of features – 33
Section 2
Team 1 – 95
- peer rating – 33
- SCRUM/github – bhall, nickle, joe sole contributors – 29
- structure of db/implementation of features – 33
Team 2 – 96
- peer rating – rated low on ease of install – 31
- SCRUM/github – best use of SCRUM and github in both sections – 34
- structure of db/implementation of features – 31